Accuracy of the Barrett Common II method built-in right into a commercially out there optical biometer when utilizing a preloaded single-piece intraocular lens


On this examine, a retrospective chart evaluation was carried out that included sufferers who underwent uneventful cataract surgical procedure with in-the-bag insertion of Vivinex™ iSert® XY1 IOL. Approval of the examine protocol was obtained from the institutional evaluation board. 5 surgeons carried out all surgical procedures by 2.4-mm clear cornea temporal incision phacoemulsification utilizing the Centurion® Imaginative and prescient System (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Value, Texas, USA). All sufferers had been measured preoperatively with the IOLMaster® 700. Approval of the examine protocol was obtained from the Institutional Evaluation Board of Machida Hospital. And the date of the approval was March twenty eighth, 2020.

This examine included the sufferers who had subjective refraction inside 45 to 135 days after surgical procedure. The exclusion standards had been sufferers with incomplete biometry, a postoperative best-corrected visible acuity of worse than 20/40, a keratometric cylinder of greater than 4.0 diopters (D), and a lens thickness measurement of lower than 2.50 mm. If each eyes had been eligible, the attention with higher visible acuity was chosen. If the visible acuity was equal in each eligible eyes, the attention nearer to 90 days after surgical procedure was chosen. No sufferers obtained bilateral surgical procedures on the identical day.

With the software program constructed into the IOLMaster® 700 (Software program Model 1.70), the IOL energy was calculated utilizing the Haigis, Holladay 1, SRK/T, and BU-II formulation. The IOL constants had been used for the reference worth offered by the producer, that’s, a0, −1.047, a1, 0.081, and a2, 0.261 for the Haigis method; surgeon issue, 2 for the Holladay 1 method; A continuing, 119.2 for the SRK/T method; and lens issue, 1.99 for the BU-II method. Lens issue was decided by changing the optimized A continuing of the SRK/T method utilizing the calculation software of the BU-II method (out there at Subjective refraction was evaluated at 3 months postoperative. Utilizing every method, the prediction error was calculated by the precise postoperative spherical equal refraction minus the expected preoperative refraction.

The imply prediction error (ME), normal deviation (SD) of prediction error, imply absolute error (MAE), and median absolute error (MedAE) had been calculated for every method. The chances of eyes inside ± 0.25 D, ±0.50 D, ±0.75 D, and ± 1.00 D of the refractive prediction error had been additionally calculated.

As a subgroup evaluation, we centered on axial size (AL) and IOL energy. AL subgroup evaluation was primarily based on the next AL subgroups: quick (<22.5 mm), medium (22.5-25.5 mm), and lengthy (>25.5 mm). IOL energy subgroup evaluation was primarily based on the next IOL energy subgroups: low (≤18.0 D), medium (18.5-24.0 D), and excessive (≥24.5 D). The IOL energy subgroup was divided into three teams with comparable proportions because the AL subgroup.

All statistical analyses had been carried out with the open-source Simple R (EZR) statistical software program, which is predicated on R and R commander.[8] It’s a modified model of R commander designed so as to add statistical features often utilized in biostatistics, and all analyses had been carried out in accordance with the editorial.[9] The variations in absolute error between the formulation had been assessed utilizing the Friedman check. Within the occasion of a big outcome, put up hoc evaluation was carried out utilizing the Wilcoxon signed-rank check with Bonferroni correction. Adjusted P values (by Bonferroni correction) lower than 0.05 had been thought of statistically important.

Similar Posts